sctrojan2006 Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 894 Likes Received: 543 Oct 10, 2018 #61 12.10 Administrative Reviews An Administrative Review consists of a meeting between the Director or designee (finder-of-fact) and the named student I. In a Voluntary Administrative Review, the student does not dispute the facts upon which the allegations are based, waives their right to further review and accepts the decision by signing an Administrative Review form. Students accepting the Administrative Review form retain the right to appeal to the appropriate appeal body only as to the appropriateness of the sanction (see Section B.15.02.II). II. In a Summary Administrative Review, the student may deny some or all of the facts upon which the allegations are based, or the student may dispute the appropriateness of the recommended sanction(s). The Director of Student Judicial Affairs and Community Standards, or designated review officer, may determine the student is responsible for the alleged violation(s) or dismiss the case, based on the preponderance of the evidence. Students found responsible for violations under the Summary Administrative Review process retain the right to appeal to the appropriate appeal body on all grounds (see Section 15.02). As an alternative to making a determination on the case, the review officer may refer the case to the Residential Education Review (Section 12.13). https://policy.usc.edu/scampus-part-b/
12.10 Administrative Reviews An Administrative Review consists of a meeting between the Director or designee (finder-of-fact) and the named student I. In a Voluntary Administrative Review, the student does not dispute the facts upon which the allegations are based, waives their right to further review and accepts the decision by signing an Administrative Review form. Students accepting the Administrative Review form retain the right to appeal to the appropriate appeal body only as to the appropriateness of the sanction (see Section B.15.02.II). II. In a Summary Administrative Review, the student may deny some or all of the facts upon which the allegations are based, or the student may dispute the appropriateness of the recommended sanction(s). The Director of Student Judicial Affairs and Community Standards, or designated review officer, may determine the student is responsible for the alleged violation(s) or dismiss the case, based on the preponderance of the evidence. Students found responsible for violations under the Summary Administrative Review process retain the right to appeal to the appropriate appeal body on all grounds (see Section 15.02). As an alternative to making a determination on the case, the review officer may refer the case to the Residential Education Review (Section 12.13). https://policy.usc.edu/scampus-part-b/
SCnAZ Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 1,200 Likes Received: 264 Oct 11, 2018 at 7:22 AM #62 Bubba I wish you the best however I hope you learn from your actions and will put the alcohol down when you get in those situations because you know how stupid people act when they are drunk or have been drinking now move on with your life and do something positive PacTrojan likes this.
Bubba I wish you the best however I hope you learn from your actions and will put the alcohol down when you get in those situations because you know how stupid people act when they are drunk or have been drinking now move on with your life and do something positive
BlemBlam Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 998 Likes Received: 722 Oct 11, 2018 at 8:29 AM #63 Problem with this is his behavior wasn’t always to do with drinking
101Coast Points Member Joined: Sep 2, 2017 Messages: 557 Likes Received: 153 Oct 11, 2018 at 9:03 AM #64 He'll be alright at Arizona State.
J4SC75 Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 227 Likes Received: 187 Oct 11, 2018 at 9:50 AM #65 Simply put, it was not a Title IX issue, why should they weigh in? PacTrojan likes this.
Sam Bam Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 88 Likes Received: 51 Oct 11, 2018 at 6:17 PM #66 So I read that too. I get the feeling from reading this his fate was sealed by an individual, not a committee. Is that the way you read it?
So I read that too. I get the feeling from reading this his fate was sealed by an individual, not a committee. Is that the way you read it?
sctrojan2006 Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 894 Likes Received: 543 Oct 11, 2018 at 6:32 PM #67 Not necessarily. I get the feeling his fate was sealed by his actions. Several have reported that it was not an isolated incident, but several incidents related to and following the original incident; along with a past history of issues on campus. Did you read the part about being able to appeal? I am wondering if he exercised his right to appeal.
Not necessarily. I get the feeling his fate was sealed by his actions. Several have reported that it was not an isolated incident, but several incidents related to and following the original incident; along with a past history of issues on campus. Did you read the part about being able to appeal? I am wondering if he exercised his right to appeal.
PacTrojan Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 301 Likes Received: 202 Oct 12, 2018 at 5:26 AM #68 At no point in his statement did he say he had apologized to the host for his behavior. It's too bad USC is prohibited by federal law from talking about this case (or any student's educational records) and allowing the SJACS to explain the reasoning for its decision. sctrojan2006 likes this.
At no point in his statement did he say he had apologized to the host for his behavior. It's too bad USC is prohibited by federal law from talking about this case (or any student's educational records) and allowing the SJACS to explain the reasoning for its decision.
