Climate change catastrophe?

Discussion in 'MKJ Off-Topic' started by ScoobyTrojan32, Oct 7, 2018.

  1. ScoobyTrojan32

    ScoobyTrojan32 Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    314
    Likes Received:
    70
    Oct 9, 2018
    #61
    I didn't attack your person I referenced your argument and knowledge base. I didn't call you stupid, a dickhead or say fuck you.
     
  2. SoCal93

    SoCal93 Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    3,370
    Likes Received:
    3,162
    Oct 9, 2018
    #62
    And likened it to incompetence to participate in the discussion. Yes it was personal. So screw you.
     
  3. TheRealAirbns

    TheRealAirbns Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    5,453
    Likes Received:
    9,388
    Oct 9, 2018
    #63
    I'ma have to go with SoCal on this one. Your response to him was arrogant, personal, and dickish. It resembles comments made by dirty butt-whores of the MS-13 gang, as well as institutionalized, brain-damaged drooling idiots who accidentally trip and fall backside-first onto a keyboard.

    Please note, though, that I'm only attacking your statement, not you.
     
    SCBIGTIME and SoCal93 like this.
  4. GaryB

    GaryB Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    3,592
    Likes Received:
    509
    Oct 9, 2018
    #64
    Real - You're wrong! The first climate model became operational over 50 years ago. The model was written by two scientists Syukuro Manabe and Richard T. Wetherald and is still in use. The model accurately predicted the global warming that has occurred over its life.

    (https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0469%281967%29024%3C0241%3ATEOTAW%3E2.0.CO%3B2)

    General Circulation models, which are used for climate modeling, have existed since the 1890s. The first computerized General Circulation model was written by Norman Phillip in 1956.

    The reason that Scientists so overwhelmingly back the fossil fuel theories is because of the time that has elapsed since the models began accurately tracking climate change, coupled with their ability to "hindcast" prior climate trends.

    You sound like the idiot with his dinosaur and renewable oil claims.
     
  5. DJ4SC

    DJ4SC Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    18,822
    Likes Received:
    21,256
    Oct 9, 2018
    #65

    So in other words.....he’s right.

    As soon as you attack you’re wrong and you know it. Did it take you a whole day to come up with that weak link of yours?

    Studies have been going on for over a hundred years.

    Like I said yesterday, stick to learning about economies and business 101.
     
  6. SoCalN8tiv

    SoCalN8tiv Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    9,688
    Likes Received:
    8,266
    Oct 9, 2018
    #66
    To clarify, "fossil fuels" is a misnomer. Oil and gas are from decayed biomatter that didn't fossilize. Under constant pressure, time, and a consistent temperature the kerogens in the biomatter essentially "crack" to form the crude. The crude and gas then rise and are contained in oil traps of the area geology formed by faulting. Then the crude is extracted using drilling and capture methods. At no time did the biomatter fossilize. Hence, the material we burn called oil and gas is not really a "fossil fuel"

    FYI ; )
     

Share This Page