Witness List Could Be Something Else Conquest4ever1981 Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 0 Likes Received: 0 Dec 7, 2015 #1 If USC lives up to the mantra of Fight On and forces Sark's hand in court we could be looking at a variety of coaches and players called to testify by both sides. This testimony should be very interesting to say the least.
If USC lives up to the mantra of Fight On and forces Sark's hand in court we could be looking at a variety of coaches and players called to testify by both sides. This testimony should be very interesting to say the least.
Jcanderson69 Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 934 Likes Received: 722 Dec 8, 2015 #1 That is one reason I think SC will settle this out of court.....I don't think they want to risk current players and coaches and past coaches testifying.....especially coaches that were just canned.
That is one reason I think SC will settle this out of court.....I don't think they want to risk current players and coaches and past coaches testifying.....especially coaches that were just canned.
TrojanHorse Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 4,978 Likes Received: 4,366 Dec 8, 2015 #1 That could be why they waited to file until after Wilcox, et al were terminated. Probably realized they would get a better settlement if these guys were terminated.
That could be why they waited to file until after Wilcox, et al were terminated. Probably realized they would get a better settlement if these guys were terminated.
Tusc2000 Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 733 Likes Received: 667 Dec 8, 2015 #1 While this scenario will never happen, poetic justice would be that any settlement money SC has to fork over should come out of Pat Haden's pocket. A terrible hiring and a terrible firing. And yet again, SC is in the headlines for all the wrong reasons.
While this scenario will never happen, poetic justice would be that any settlement money SC has to fork over should come out of Pat Haden's pocket. A terrible hiring and a terrible firing. And yet again, SC is in the headlines for all the wrong reasons.
Conquest4ever1981 Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 0 Likes Received: 0 Dec 8, 2015 #1 If there was ever a time to put Fight On into practice it is now by agressively defending against Sark's bullshit lawsuit.
If there was ever a time to put Fight On into practice it is now by agressively defending against Sark's bullshit lawsuit.
george the tirebiter Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 13 Likes Received: 25 Dec 9, 2015 #1 I agree. USC fired Sark when he said he did not have a problem.
contracostatrojan Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 1,412 Likes Received: 2,384 Dec 9, 2015 #1 Could be a catch-22 for Haden. If former Washington players and coaches are subpoenaed does that cast some doubt about Haden's vetting of Sark in the first place??
Could be a catch-22 for Haden. If former Washington players and coaches are subpoenaed does that cast some doubt about Haden's vetting of Sark in the first place??
TailbackU Junior Member Joined: Aug 24, 2017 Messages: 4 Likes Received: 3 Dec 9, 2015 #1 the issues raised by the complaint you could have witnesses as to all his behavior and activity at USC, UW, even dating back to BYU since the complaint raises that and his divorce.... That complaint raises almost every aspect of his life going back to when he started college. The complaint has created open season on discovery. Sark's lawyers made a huge mistake in over pleading the case.
the issues raised by the complaint you could have witnesses as to all his behavior and activity at USC, UW, even dating back to BYU since the complaint raises that and his divorce.... That complaint raises almost every aspect of his life going back to when he started college. The complaint has created open season on discovery. Sark's lawyers made a huge mistake in over pleading the case.