Sidney Powell: Massive Voting Fraud That Can Be Proven

Discussion in 'MKJ Off-Topic' started by SoCalN8tiv, Nov 15, 2020.

  1. Jpltrojan

    Jpltrojan Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    3,766
    Likes Received:
    3,660
    Jun 11, 2021
    …and certified.
     
    SCBIGTIME and CrownoftheValley like this.
  2. fansincemckay

    fansincemckay Points Member


    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2018
    Messages:
    4,934
    Likes Received:
    4,946
    Jun 11, 2021
    Yep.
     
  3. DJ4SC

    DJ4SC Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    35,821
    Likes Received:
    52,474
    Jun 11, 2021

    Yeah, it’s not even amusing anymore watching him squirm like a pretzel to try and stay relevant.

    All traitors should be executed.
     
    SCBIGTIME and CrownoftheValley like this.
  4. TheRealAirbns

    TheRealAirbns Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    14,329
    Likes Received:
    49,221
    Jun 11, 2021
    This outlines one of the failures. Someone needs to reply to the UCSB PD that they have a potential mail problem, not an elections problem, so it is, in fact, still a potential problem within their jurisdiction. If it's not a mail problem, it's potentially a mail theft problem.

    At the very least, it's a problem they should investigate, to find out. Was the mail delivered? If yes, how did it get into hands other than the addressee's?

    And why isn't the US Postal Service investigating this?

    Claiming that it's an elections problem is inaccurate, and it's just a lazy way of punting the issue down the road.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2021
  5. Jpltrojan

    Jpltrojan Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    3,766
    Likes Received:
    3,660
    Jun 11, 2021
    They clearly don’t want any part of investigating anything related to a fraudulent election. If they find a mail fraud issue they would have to prosecute putting them in conflict with Dems.
     
    SCBIGTIME and CrownoftheValley like this.
  6. Gold Trojan

    Gold Trojan Points Member


    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2017
    Messages:
    2,137
    Likes Received:
    2,300
    Jun 11, 2021
    You would think that a Supreme Court nominee would know that the states have control over elections.

    DC is in massive panic mode.

    I’m thinking that WI, MI, PA, VA, NH, GA, AZ, and NV may all be more ‘Red’ than what was purported.
     
    SCBIGTIME and DJ4SC like this.
  7. SoCalN8tiv

    SoCalN8tiv Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    16,676
    Likes Received:
    21,322
    Jun 11, 2021
    Yep. Deduced with the sound thinking of an engineer, unlike sucxx the fake engineer.

    As Eringer wrote, "This is not rocket science."

    GaryB continues to struggle with the obvious, I take it?
     
    SCBIGTIME and CrownoftheValley like this.
  8. SoCalN8tiv

    SoCalN8tiv Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    16,676
    Likes Received:
    21,322
    Jun 11, 2021
    Full meltdown.
     
    DJ4SC likes this.
  9. fansincemckay

    fansincemckay Points Member


    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2018
    Messages:
    4,934
    Likes Received:
    4,946
    Jun 11, 2021
    SCBIGTIME and CrownoftheValley like this.
  10. fansincemckay

    fansincemckay Points Member


    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2018
    Messages:
    4,934
    Likes Received:
    4,946
    Jun 11, 2021
     
  11. fansincemckay

    fansincemckay Points Member


    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2018
    Messages:
    4,934
    Likes Received:
    4,946
    Jun 11, 2021
    Don't forget Ca.
     
    CrownoftheValley likes this.
  12. Gold Trojan

    Gold Trojan Points Member


    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2017
    Messages:
    2,137
    Likes Received:
    2,300
    Jun 11, 2021
    Spoke with a gentleman from Massachusetts last week. He said, don’t believe that New England is solid blue. There are a ton of old Kennedy style Democrats that lean right in today’s political spectrum.
     
  13. SoCalN8tiv

    SoCalN8tiv Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    16,676
    Likes Received:
    21,322
    Jun 11, 2021
    Why is this thing called the US Constitution so difficult for the leftist idiot trolls to understand?

    Article I, Section 4, Clause 1:

    The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

    By its terms, Article I, Section 4, Clause 1, also contemplates the times, places, and manner of holding elections being prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof, subject to alteration by Congress (except as to the place of choosing Senators). However, the Court did not have occasion to address what constitutes regulation by a state Legislature for purposes of the Elections Clause until its 2015 decision in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission.1 There, the Court rejected the Arizona legislature’s challenge to the validity of the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (AIRC) and AIRC’s 2012 map of congressional districts.2 The Commission had been established by a 2000 ballot initiative, which removed redistricting authority from the legislature and vested it in the AIRC.3 The legislature asserted that this arrangement violated the Elections Clause because the Clause contemplates regulation by a state Legislature and Legislature means the state’s representative assembly.4

    The Court disagreed and held that Arizona’s use of an independent commission to establish congressional districts is permissible because the Elections Clause uses the word Legislature to describe the power that makes laws, a term that is broad enough to encompass the power provided by the Arizona constitution for the people to make laws through ballot initiatives.5 In so finding, the Court noted that the word Legislature has been construed in various ways depending upon the constitutional provision in which it is used, and its meaning depends upon the function that the entity denominated as the Legislature is called upon to exercise in a specific context.6 Here, in the context of the Elections Clause, the Court found that the function of the Legislature was lawmaking and that this function could be performed by the people of Arizona via an initiative consistent with state law.7 The Court also pointed to dictionary definitions from the time of the Framers;8the Framers’ intent in adopting the Elections Clause;9 the harmony between the initiative process and the Constitution’s conception of the people as the font of governmental power;10 and the practical consequences of invalidating the Arizona initiative.11

    State authority to regulate the times, places, and manner of holding congressional elections has been described by the Court as embrac[ing] authority to provide a complete code for congressional elections ...; in short, to enact the numerous requirements as to procedure and safeguards which experience shows are necessary in order to enforce the fundamental rights involved.12 The Court has upheld a variety of state laws designed to ensure that elections—including federal elections – are fair and honest and orderly.13 But the Court distinguished state laws that go beyond protection of the integrity and regularity of the election process, and instead operate to disadvantage a particular class of candidates.14 Term limits, viewed as serving the dual purposes of disadvantaging a particular class of candidates and evading the dictates of the Qualifications Clause, crossed this line,15 as did ballot labels identifying candidates who disregarded voters’ instructions on term limits or declined to pledge support for them.16 [T]he Framers understood the Elections Clause as a grant of authority to issue procedural regulations, and not as a source of power to dictate electoral outcomes, to favor or disfavor a class of candidates, or to evade important constitutional restraints.17




     
  14. DJ4SC

    DJ4SC Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    35,821
    Likes Received:
    52,474
    Jun 11, 2021

    One slight but important correction.
    We The People out number them by a long shot.
     
    CrownoftheValley likes this.
  15. fansincemckay

    fansincemckay Points Member


    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2018
    Messages:
    4,934
    Likes Received:
    4,946
    Jun 11, 2021
    I literally just saw an ad on TV pushing this very same horse shit 5 mins. ago.
     
  16. old scotty

    old scotty Junior Member


    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Messages:
    16,811
    Likes Received:
    20,700
    Jun 11, 2021
    Garland is a weasel....look for a weasel move
     
    CrownoftheValley likes this.

Share This Page